On 08/12/2010, at 3:52 AM, Jed Smith wrote: > It's good to see that libcloud could become more > than a specific language's bindings; it could become a contract for a > developer to work with clouds, regardless of implementation language. I > would like to see development on this front, and I have ideas on how to do > so. The timing simply isn't right, until we can put thought into how best to > handle this - it's more documentation instead of outright code. Such > development would ultimately change the vision of libcloud from a Python > library to a metalibrary, and I don't want to approach that lightly.
That sounds an awful lot like writing standards for service interfaces. Not sure that's appropriate for Apache to do, but it'd be interesting... Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
