I would say the bylaws are more of a direct interpretation of the ASF general policy. It is more to the point and would allow us to have an easy to get through guideline for project operation directly on the project site. But as Apache rules go, your -0 is an implicit veto. We can end the vote here.
Thank You, Philip Schwartz Software Engineering LexisNexis RIAG O - 561 999 4472 C - 954 290 4024 -----Original Message----- From: Paul Querna [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 10:41 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [libcloud] [vote] Usage of Ant bylaws for libcloud. -0, I don't believe bylaws are needed for operation of a PMC. The basics are covered under general foundation policy (how to release, how to vote), and the Ant bylaws is a rulebook that just isn't needed. On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Schwartz, Philip Marc (LNG-BCT) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please vote for or against using the Ant bylaws > (http://ant.apache.org/bylaws.html) for the libcloud project. > > These bylaws do a very good job of defining the project organization and > voting process as done in the Apache way. I think if we can get consensus and > use these bylaws, we will have the start of organization so we can move to > setup a PMC and move forward with votes pertaining to the project. > > > My vote is +1 > > This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information > intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If > you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any > disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any > action based on it, is strictly prohibited. > This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
