Hello,

I think we need to postpone the 0.4.1 release because I have unintentionally
brake API in the EC2 driver.

list_locations method now returns a list of EC2NodeLocation objects instead
of a list of NodeLocation objects.

I think we should change list_locations back to return a list of
NodeLocation objects and add another ex_list_locations method which returns
a list of EC2NodeLocation objects.

Then we have three options for the create_node method:

1. Allow user to pass NodeLocation or EC2NodeLocation object for the
location keyword argument
2. Allow user to pass in the ex_location keyword argument which must be an
instance of EC2NodeLocation
3. Add ex_create_node which is the same as the create_node method but it
takes an instance of the EC2NodeLocation class for the location keyword
argument

I am really sorry for this, I promise I will be more careful next time.

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:11 AM, Paul Querna <[email protected]> wrote:

> it looks like the release tag didn't edit the version correctly:
>
> <
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/libcloud/tags/0.4.1/libcloud/__init__.py
> >
>
> (its still 0.4.1-dev)
>
> I'd suggest re-rolling with it fixed.  The process I used before was
> to remove the -dev from trunk, then make the tag, then increment +
> re-add -dev in trunk.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Jerry Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.4.1 are available at:
> >  <http://people.apache.org/~jerry/libcloud-0.4.1/>
> >
> > Please test and place your votes:
> >
> >  +/- 1
> >  [  ]  Release Apache Libcloud 0.4.1
> >
> > Vote closes on Sunday January 9, 2011 at 10pm PST.
> >
> > This release introduces new drivers, improvements to deployment
> capabilities, and libcloud.security module for SSL certificate verification.
> >
> > For more information on SSL verification:
> >  <http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LibcloudSSL>
> >
> > For the full list of changes, see:
> >  <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/libcloud/tags/0.4.1/CHANGES
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jerry
>

Reply via email to