Seriously - what's your agenda? Where are the domains for the other tens of providers who charge arms and legs based on closed protocols even?
What's the nit with Silent Circle specifically? Because they're accessible? Because it's easier to use? Because the founders have good track records of standing up to Government too? Being absolutist about everything isn't helping anyone who ~needs~ it - it's a privilege of the "haves" that we can have these conversations over and over again. Shouldn't we have taken the "fight" to carriers, Apple iOS T&Cs, etc. harder and longer ago? And why do we keep expecting private entities to fight our Government battles for us? It's a losing proposition and increases the costs-per-individual to untenable levels when we mix absolutely all their enterprise with civil liberty issues. There has got to be a better way than this ridiculous trolling and bickering. Someone? Anyone? Again, seriously, what's the agenda against Silent Circle specifically? -Ali On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Nadim Kobeissi <[email protected]> wrote: > http://issilentcircleopensourceyet.com/ > > NK > > -- > Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech >
-- Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
