Hi,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 01:19:47PM +0100, KheOps wrote:
> > DPI censorship is not a 'competitive' advantage, so it's quite likely that
> > in a pure market society ('anarchocapitalism') without strong socialistic
> > governments and their stupid Internet regulations, most Internet providers
> > WILL
> > NOT censor their connections, otherwise they will loose their customers.
> > Most
> > customers are not willing to pay for censored Internet if they can choose
> > unfiltered free Internet. And the only one who can take them this right is
> > a monopoly for laws/regulations - the centralized government.
>
> I'd say it can happen for purely economic reasons. For instance, in
> France, some ISPs used to have marketing agreements with Dailymotion and
> consequently slowed down Youtube access.
This is completely fine if customers decide for this kind of "marketing / ads"
Internet connection for free (and accept all related advertisements).
I am more than sure there will be also an economical demand for non-ads,
non-filtered and fast Internet and many people will be willing to pay for it.
So market will work.
Pavol
--
_______________________________________________________________
[wil...@trip.sk] [http://trip.sk/wilder/] [talker: ttt.sk 5678]
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
