+1 Best case scenario they still won't be open source, so what do we expect from them really, good intentions?
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Rich Kulawiec <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:23:30PM +0200, Nadim Kobeissi wrote: > > Isn't it time for an open letter regarding Skype? > > No. > > Not that I disagree with your concerns or anything like that: > they're valid. > > But because there is absolutely no reason to expect truthful and complete > answers from Skype. > > In fact, there are many reasons to expect lies and incomplete answers, > because it's clearly in their self-interest to provide them and because > there are no negative consequences for them if they do. > > Thus no matter how well-phrased and well-intentioned such a letter is, > the best possible result (a response from Skype) is still operationally > useless, no matter what it says. > > ---rsk > -- > Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech >
-- Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
