-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/22/2012 02:02 PM, Uncle Zzzen wrote:
> Best case scenario they still won't be open source, so what do we > expect from them really, good intentions? There is no reason to expect that anything good for anyone other than them will come from such a letter. Not with this on deck: http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=20110153809&OS=20110153809&RS=20110153809 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/29/microsoft_skype/ https://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9218002/Microsoft_seeks_patent_for_spy_tech_for_Skype It would make no sense at all for them to do the work to file a patent on CALEA intercept of Skype traffic and then not do anything with it. - -- The Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS|Media] Developer, Project Byzantium: http://project-byzantium.org/ PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1 WWW: https://drwho.virtadpt.net/ "We can't stop here, this is tentacle country!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDbVdQACgkQO9j/K4B7F8GGFQCgx5QPVcv3jTIU2FVenLi3R1GI DlIAnRrQg2gt8Mzq3sELWngMtP1NGMZA =BJaD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
