Am 29.01.2013 04:42, schrieb scarp: > While Google fights for privacy, somewhat against lower level law > enforcement requiring them to have supporting legal documentation > authorizing them to have access to that information. What makes you think that they defend/advocate privacy? The ongoing debate on this side of the Atlantic: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/26/technology/eu-privacy-proposal-lays-bare-differences-with-us.html?_r=0 > > Hosting your own email in another country outside of the US would be a > good idea, because we all know the NSA records everything anyway that > goes across US networks. ... > All we do seem to know is the NSA has plans to "record the entire > Internet". Even if they did, only a limited audience would get access. You can't use extralegal information in court. Noticed that simplified logic of either private/safe or public/unsafe here before. If I don't lock my house or use an unsafe mechanism to lock it (like 99.99% of the population) that doesn't mean anyone is invited to enter and seize my property.
New study of the EP: Fighting cyber crime and protecting privacy in the cloud: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/studiesdownload.html?languageDocument=EN&file=79050 Heise reports US diplomates slightly over the top against EU data protection (German) http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/US-Diplomat-warnt-vor-Handelskrieg-wegen-EU-Datenschutzreform-1792765.html Best, A -- Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
