-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 25/02/13 19:03, Raven Jiang CX wrote: > I think a subtle difference is what exactly the bargain entails. In > the case of television advertising, it's a relatively > straightforward exchange of your attention for entertainment. > Facebook is asking for more than that. The marketing is less > oppressive because they receive the addition payment of your > personal information. No one really knows what that information in > aggregate is worth or can be capable of achieving in the long term, > so I suppose implicitly the users (at least those aware of this > bargain) are betting on it being worth less than the services > Facebook provides.
I don't think framing it as an individual bargain fully captures what's going on here. Each user gives Facebook information not only about themselves but about the people they know (including those who don't use Facebook). So it's a social dilemma or tragedy of the commons: the cost of each person's privacy choices is shared by others. Each user of Facebook produces a negative externality that affects those around them. As such, perhaps the appropriate metaphor is not "personal information as property" but "surveillance as pollution". Cheers, Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRLNj2AAoJEBEET9GfxSfMqSAH/RPSLGIRRVc6IyLJMAKBYSJE UVHZ97boE2d9NlatEHenhGmDBoe7Tm2P2oZEnjWS/nazi3Z/mBCS3xOI0HVdH+xH HcPhDIE/cV0FjhpKAPsW5lYqDQfr3XDauAlvLhzVeMEkzeC8ccDv8TztWEI1spzI hX2DC9PtKEDuPjkDC50qRazuqWzyGwW3Dj4FGqo8xKRe0i7ZLQFuR9avoOKDI2hi uUU6+h6P2ORwxotO41GRZHBaFtcGM+kcPS+llidRfuRDu42x57zqAbJRdd24xZAs yoz9PE28pGe/x1UHMXdzt3bHyCPdoDyeEAloJ324c0+g9sMfr+Lznsmm9vQcfGs= =ehnW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
