Moreover when they say "our backend infrastructure"... So the service will be centralized? Bad approach...
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --search-keys EEE5A447http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xEEE5A447&op=vindex > From: [email protected] > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:36:33 +0200 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [liberationtech] Heml.is - "The Beautiful & Secure Messenger" > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Nadim Kobeissi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > "Will it be Open Source? > > We have all intentions of opening up the source as much as possible for > > scrutiny and help! What we really want people to understand however, is > > that Open Source in itself does not guarantee any privacy or safety. It > > sure helps with transparency, but technology by itself is not enough. The > > fundamental benefits of Heml.is will be the app together with our backend > > infrastructure, which is what really makes the system interesting and > > secure." — https://heml.is/ > > > > I'm sort of infamous by now for the fusses I make regarding the importance > > of open-sourcing security software. I'm pretty sure people are tired of me > > so I'm going to be quiet. But it's clear to me that Hemlis's answer is not > > the right answer. > > Hi: > > Agreed. I won't support heml.is if it's not libre software, as it > seems to be the case. They want 100k $ to fund non-free software. > That's something I don't think people should support. > > Regards, > -- > Eduardo Robles Elvira +34 668 824 393 skype: edulix2 > http://www.wadobo.com it's not magic, it's wadobo! > -- > Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by > emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
-- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
