> > noone said it would be closed source. That's peoples guess. Like, your > > guess, I guess.
According to their twitter account, the answer is "maybe": https://twitter.com/HemlisMessenger/statuses/354927721337470976 Peter Sunde (one of the people behind it) said "eventually", but in my experience promises like that tend to be broken: https://twitter.com/brokep/status/354608029242626048 > and the feature 'unlocking' aspect of the project - to be indication of a > proprietary code base. Frankly I can't see how they could get the "feature unlock" funding stuff to work well if it's proper open source. As I'd expect people to fork it to remove such antifeatures. It's a pity, as several new funding models have been successful recently which are compatible with free software, but this doesn't look to be one of them. -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
