To get back to the original topic: Isn't this just what Peter has been stating when asked? That Hemlis first of all hasn't even claimed anything regarding the stoics when the criticism came, but more importantly that the potential open source development doesn't really solve all problems and risks - why such a stringent focus could be dangerous in itself.
Marcin 11 jul 2013 kl. 22:55 skrev Mitar <[email protected]>: > I hear you what you are saying. That open source is a good (must?) > practice to do when developing security-sensitive servers. But it is > far from enough. -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected] or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
