On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 2:59 PM, katana <[email protected]> wrote: > And this was the heart of SC's problems and - realistic - fears, not the > "insecure email" marketing talk. They have used PGP Universal, managed > and generated the keys for their clients, because of the mobile > computing demands(?) of their customers - or their incompetence(?) / not > existing ressources to develop a mobile OpenPGP solution? As Phil said *snip*
PGP Universal was never meant for this application, we can all agree there.. but the convenience it allowed in theory from an end-user standpoint is still something we're trying to replicate everywhere else. It's obviously not a trivial problem because we have a baker's dozen variants nobody can agree on at any given time. How many "solutions" to part of the overall end-user challenge set have we seen on this list alone in the past two weeks? We need a libtech retreat that we don't leave from until we code out and agreeable solution for our massively varied end-user cases. ;-) -Ali -- Liberationtech is a public list whose archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected].
