coderman: > **why not instead focus on building low latency protocols > that are resistant to traffic analysis and confirmation?** > > make them datagram based; utilize user space stacks and latest > research. solving the low latency datagram anonymity problem enables > existing usable private communication with the additional benefit of > endpoint and peer anonymity. > > i believe this possible to make useful, even if never infallible. > certainly more possible than the odds of making truly scalable, > available, and _usable_ mix mailer networks and clients for the > masses. > > most important: make this low latency infrastructure usable and cross > platform, so the implementations are easily adopted... like Napster > and BitTorrent back in the day. ;)
Unrealistic, isn't it? Who could possibly pay for design, implementation and maintenance? Look how many millions The Tor Project received over the last years. [1] To no avail. Fixing confirmation attacks or other hard anonymity problems still isn't on the horizon. I am happy to be proven wrong, but not positive that this will happen. [1] https://www.torproject.org/about/sponsors.html.en -- Liberationtech is a public list whose archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected].
