On 01 November, 2013 - Maxim Kammerer wrote: > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Sacha van Geffen <[email protected]> wrote: > > “Together our mission is simple: To bring the world a unique end-to-end > > encrypted protocol and architecture that is the ‘next-generation’ of > > private and secure email. What we call ‘Email 3.0.’ is an urgent > > replacement for today’s decades old email protocols (‘1.0’) and mail > > that is encrypted but still relies on vulnerable protocols leaking > > metadata (‘2.0’),” they said in a blog post announcing the alliance. > > Does their mission also include making their service offerings > redundant? E.g., anyone who does not need SMTP interoperability (let's > call this innovative concept “Email 3.0”) can use cables communication > [1], which is serverless.
I would imagine that they are aiming for something with reasonably easy-to-remember identifiers (and less anonymity), as well as something where you could relatively easily sync your inbox between devices, at least as an option. I'd say join the list (or approach them directly) and post your ideas if you feel that you can contribute, though. They've got the names, media attention and marketing to get _something_ rolling which is better than the status quo. Best make it as good as possible. /P > > [1] http://dee.su/cables > > -- > Maxim Kammerer > Liberté Linux: http://dee.su/liberte > -- > Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of > list guidelines will get you moderated: > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, > change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at > [email protected]. -- Petter Ericson ([email protected]) Telecomix Sleeper Jellyfish -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected].
