Fabio, Edwin, what about a hybrid option? http://bitmail.sf.net it supports IMAP email (could be extended with PGP) and secure p2p Email, so the postbox is your (third) email partner. http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Jacob-Appelbaum-Schafft-die-E-Mail-ab-1966786.html But as you read, others are as well not comfortable with a hybridity with @Mail. Regards
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Edwin Chu <[email protected]> Why is it better to limit our innovation to the existing standards when creating the nonexistent secure messaging system? Sometimes we could improve security of a system by adding layers to it, like HTTPS and ZRTP; sometimes hacking on a legacy protocol isn't good enough and we create new things. After all, even we just add a new layer to existing standards, we are creating new standards. While resemblance to existing protocol may boost software adoption, I don't see it is wrong to design a new protocol (having it based on existing one or not) and then make it a de facto/official standard. Edwin
-- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected].
