On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:42:33PM -0500, Alfredo Lopez wrote: > On 12/18/2013 03:24 PM, Andy Isaacson wrote: > > CCing NANOG, since this might be of interest there. Please keep > > the discussion focused on technical routing issues rather than > > politics or conspiracy theories. > > > > I don't understand this, Andy. Isn't politics the purpose of this > list? Otherwise, it just becomes another tech list. Or am I missing > something?
This particular sub-thread is about the technical aspects of this block. Such technical aspects are relevant both to liberationtech and to NANOG. I'm in favor of libtech maintaining a political bent. That is part of its list charter. I'm not in favor of libtech's political bent leaking onto NANOG. That is not part of the NANOG charter. There's an intersection of interests in this particular scenario, and I was attempting to craft an intersectional discussion. However, both lists are subscriber-only, so my attempt is a failure. (And in retrospect was probably misguided, neither audience is especially willing to meet the other halfway.) -andy -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected].
