Anders Thoresson <[email protected]> [2014-01-15 11:23:04 +0100]: > Comparing the findings made by Whittens and compare them to the software > available today, not much seems to have happened. But does the conclusion > still holds, that a lack of mass-adoption of email encryption is due to > problematic UX
This reminds me of a recent Ars Technica story[1] with the headline, "Encrypted e-mail: How much annoyance will you tolerate to keep the NSA away?" Sub-heading: "How to to encrypt e-mail, and why most don't bother." > – or are there other reasons that today are seen as more important? There was a thread on LibTech titled "10 reasons not to start using PGP"[2] that you might be interested in. [1]: <http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/06/encrypted-e-mail-how-much-annoyance-will-you-tolerate-to-keep-the-nsa-away/> [2]: <https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg07744.html> -- Pranesh Prakash Policy Director, Centre for Internet and Society T: +91 80 40926283 | W: http://cis-india.org ------------------- Access to Knowledge Fellow, Information Society Project, Yale Law School M: +1 520 314 7147 | W: http://yaleisp.org PGP ID: 0x1D5C5F07 | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pranesh_prakash
-- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected].
