On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 05:15:50PM +0300, Maxim Kammerer wrote: > Are you referring to the survey from Nov 2013 [1]? Because I don't see > anything from what I wrote wrt. Cables on that page. > > [1] > https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/liberationtech/2013-November/012255.html
Yes I was referring to that. What you see in the document is what I wrote about Cables, hope that's mostly correct. The other version only has a link to your source code and a few claims about P2P which are partially incorrect for Cables as it isn't a P2P system. Yet it says, "Except for Pond, all these alternatives take a pure peer-to-peer approach." So it claims you are P2P. Several technologies that are listed there are not P2P in fact. Maybe it would be more useful if OpenTechFund simply made all those contibutions available so people who actually understand the technologies can organize them accordingly. -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected].
