On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:22 PM, carlo von lynX <[email protected]> wrote: > What you see in the document is what I wrote about Cables, > hope that's mostly correct. > > The other version only has a link to your source code > and a few claims about P2P which are partially incorrect > for Cables as it isn't a P2P system.
Well, sure, I understand why the original document is written as it is, as the writer obviously has his own agenda — what I don't understand is where all those extensive survey contributions went to. I expended quite some effort in writing those, and I assume other people did so as well, so it's weird that OTF apparently (unless I misunderstand what happened) simply delegated the contributions to some guy whose project they funded. I hoped that OTF was something more than a router for Asia region CIA money — the survey looked quite professional, and I expected them to do something useful with the results. Oh well. > Maybe it would be more useful if OpenTechFund simply > made all those contibutions available so people who > actually understand the technologies can organize them > accordingly. Indeed. -- Maxim Kammerer Liberté Linux: http://dee.su/liberte -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at [email protected].
