Who cares if they murdered someone in Iraq? That has nothing to do with America and doesn't endanger America. I wouldn't care if Saddam and his sons, raped women, got them pregnant, cut them open, took the fetus, boiled it and ate it on television. That wouldn't be a valid reason or provocation for the U.S. Military to get involved.
--- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero Rittberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right. And Uday and Qusay never tortured or murdered anyone, > right. All those eye-witnesses are just liars. And all those dead > bodies in the ground? Well, they died in accidents falling off > their bicycles on the way to the Mosque. > > > --- In [email protected], "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Plotting to assasinate a man who launched an unprovoked attack > against > > your nation, established illegal "no fly zones", bombed you daily, > and > > kicked open your doors and those of your countrymen to search for > > weapons you don't even have, and subsequently starve more than > 200,000 > > people to death and keep them from live saving medicines as George > > H.W. Bush did, is not enough. > > > > In fact NOTHING short of absolutely undeniable solid proof that > Iraq > > made a DIRECT ATTACK on AMERICAN SHIPS (Registered in America, not > > Kuwaiti ships putting American flags up) or AMERICAN SOIL is > enough to > > get the U.S. military involved. > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Deus Ex Machina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > didnt sadaam plot to assasinate Bush snr? thats good enough > > > justification > > > > > > > > > Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Saddam Hussein had absolutely NOTHING to do with the Oklahoma > City > > > > bombing, and NOTHING to do with the September 11th attacks. > Anyone > > > > who says otherwise is a liar, an idiot, or both. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero Rittberg" > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Saddam Hussein through his henchmen attacked the United > States, > > > > > brutally right in the Heartland of America in 1995 in > Oklahoma > > City, > > > > > Oklahoma. Perhaps you heard of it? 183 innocent Americans > died. > > > > > But Clinton and Janet Reno covered it up and pinned it on > some ex- > > > > > Army schmuck with a broken licence plate. > > > > > > > > > > READ THE JAYNA DAVIS BOOK, The Third > > > > > > > > Terrorist!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > > > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > There you go again misusing the word "defense". Here's a > clue for > > > > > > you. DEFENSE never includes attacking someone first. It > NEVER > > > > > > includes starting unprovoked wars like the one in Iraq. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nobody....I repeat....NOBODY who supports using the U.S. > Military > > > > > to > > > > > > take part in wars against those who have not directly > attacked us > > > > > is a > > > > > > libertarian. I don't care when they were in the party. I > don't > > > > > care > > > > > > if they started the party. THEY ARE NOT LIBERTARIANS!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero Rittberg" > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Question for ya Paul. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Throught the 1970s and 1980s within the Libertarian > Party there > > > > > was a > > > > > > > very active and popular group called the Libertarian > Defense > > > > > Caucus. > > > > > > > It was headed up by Mike Dunn or Washington State. It > included > > > > > > > prominent Libertarians like Earl Ravenal and Bob Poole. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The LDC was a "Pro-Defense" Libertarian group, which > > > > > enthusiastically > > > > > > > supported SDI, and a Strong Military to fight the > Communists. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The LDC operated well-within the guidelines of the > Libertarian > > > > > Party > > > > > > > and were a very well accepted group within the LP, even > by > > those > > > > > who > > > > > > > vehemently disagreed with them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Seeing as you are Anti-Defense, would you have had the > LNC kick > > > > > the > > > > > > > LDC out of the LP? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Paul" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Actually it's a concise and straightforward > description of > > the > > > > > truth. > > > > > > > > It's reality whether you choose to admit it or not > and it > > > > > remains a > > > > > > > > fact regardless of how much you dislike it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Deus Ex Machina > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > There are absolutely NO actual libertarians who > support > > > > > the war > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > Iraq. Supporting the war in Iraq automatically > > > > > disqualifies you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > its a tautology. its in fact not related to reality. > sorry. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vic > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpgUKB/pzNLAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
