Interesting, and true. But taotally irrelivant to the questions asked. Pre-birth is only a side issue in this questioning.
Here it is again.: ------------------------------------------ And in a free society, there is the concept of responsibility for ones actions. If ones actions creates a new person, what are the responsibilities of those that create it to that new life? And up to what point? ------------------------------------------ >><Paul>The responsible thing to do is whatever is best for your situation. >>NOTHING inside the body of a human has rights; NOTHING. Even if a fetus were >>a human (which it's not) it would have no rights. There are no "rights of >>the unborn", there are no "unborn persons", etc. Nothing has rights as long as it is within the body of a human being. A responsible person will do the responsible thing for themselves. In many cases, the most responsible thing means eliminating the fetus. Nobody has any right or legitimate authority to tell anyone what they may or may not do with their own body or anything inside that body, to prevent them from doing anything, or to punish anything they do.<< ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpgUKB/pzNLAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
