Mark, while MORAL values of 'good/bad' can only be attributed 
to 'persons' one can still evaluate non-persons as being 
'good/bad' PRAGMATICALLY for various 'uses'  

You and I pragmatically value capitalism that is consistent 
to UNIVERSAL libertarianism as good for economic progress.  
But, there may be occasions when economic progress is not as 
important as something else; say donating to church perhaps.  
So, while a TOTALLY 'free market' capitalism allows for things 
like 'Murder Inc' UNIVERSALIZED libertarianism would not.  
Something may be 'judged' as being 'good/bad' PRAGMATICALLY 
for a given use, but it's the free will conscious 'choice' 
made by a 'person' to which MORAL 'judgement' of 'good/bad' 
is exclusive.  'Morality' is only attributable to 'persons'  

Btw, as to your fascism* request: it may be 'good' for people 
who violate the libertarian physical aggression truce in the 
form of containment (prison?)   :)  

* 2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic 
or dictatorial control 
at http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=fascism 
 

-Terry Liberty Parker 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 



--- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Terry,
> 
>  
> 
> Now, since you've erased the line between human behavior and
> inanimate objects, I'm even more confused about what should and
> shouldn't be called good or bad. If I'm reading you correctly,
> the only thing that should be called "bad" is aggressive human
> behavior, and nothing can be called "good". If the latter is
> incorrect, tell me something you think is good.
> 
>  
> 
> IMO, things don't have to preclude occasional harm/abuse to be
> deserving of "good" labels. I say hammers are good, even though
> I'm sure they've been responsible for many sore thumbs and some
> murdered people. Unless you are talking about things like torture
> chambers and big governments, the benefits of a tool usually
> outweighs its disadvantages. Or maybe not; but in any case, we
> can use our intelligence to do the sorting and make accurate use
> of "good" and "bad". 
> 
>  
> 
> I'll accept your mission. I think can see both good and bad
> potential in each. But. I'm not sure murder-for-hire could fall
> under free-market capitalism, since murder would not be a free
> market. I see few-to-no "bad" (relative to "worse" systems)
> things coming from free-market capitalism. So why should I not
> call free-market capitalism "good"? Let's turn this around a bit
> and throw fascism into the pot. I can't see a whole lot of
> potential good coming from it. Can you?
> 
>  
> 
> Maybe I can address the core of your reasoning: personal
> responsibility. I see most attempts to duck it as scapegoating,
> which consists of falsely labeling something as bad ("the bad
> booze/drug made me do it"). I am having a hard time seeing how
> one would duck personal responsibility by falsely labeling
> something as good. Maybe you could give an example. I submit that
> your goal could be better reached by exposing such "bad" labels
> as false, since false "good calling" would seem to be less the
> culprit (far less common).    
> 
>  
> 
> -Mark
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
>  
> 
> Mark, that cpaitalism 'is usually life-supporting without 
> a non-consensual victim)' does NOT preclude its being used 
> in harmful (bad) ways which murder non-consensuals, too  :(  
> 
> Capitalism, socialism, communalism, individualism, collectivism 
> and so on, are all ways that persons can interact.  They can 
> be 'good' or 'bad' means (tools) for interaction depending 
> on how 'persons' decide to use them.  But, responsibiltiy for 
> doing 'good' or 'bad' can NOT be exported away from the 'person' 
> who acts.  
> 
> Persons can use capitalism as a means for doing good OR bad!  
> 
> Jim, er... I mean Mark, your mission, if decide to accept it: 
> 
> As an exersize, try to imagine and describe implementations 
> of capitalism, socialism, communalism, individualism,
> collectivism 
> and so on, with EACH employed as a means (tool) for BOTH 'good' 
> and 'bad' ends.  
> 
> as usual, the non-thinkers will disavow this effort 
> 
> and this e-mail will self-destruct in five minutes  :)  
> 
> 
> -Terry Liberty Parker 
> Please read what I wrote in 
> What's at the Heart of What Libertarians are Selling? 
> at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/30419 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   _____  
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
`





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to