I agree with you, nevertheless not everyone would be willing to participate. 
Forcing people to be good is impossible.
Anna
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Terry L Parker 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 12:19 AM
  Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Discussing Capitalism: the Good the Bad & the Ugly


  I believe that anything can be used by a person in a good 
  or bad way  :)  

  I also believe that UNIVERSAL libertarianism is, pragmatically, 
  a good concept to be more fully adopted by persons.  Additionally, 
  I believe it to be the 'morally good' choice for virtually 
  everybody.  

  AKA: Liberty and Justice for ALL

  -Terry Liberty Parker 
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 


  --- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  >
  > Terry,
  > 
  >  
  > 
  > Now I have to ask you if universalized libertarianism is "good" /
  > "magic". Is it? Or can it also be used either way?
  > 
  >  
  > 
  > -Mark
  > 
  >  
  > 
  >   _____  
  > 
  >  
  > 
  > Mark, while MORAL values of 'good/bad' can only be attributed 
  > to 'persons' one can still evaluate non-persons as being 
  > 'good/bad' PRAGMATICALLY for various 'uses'  
  > 
  > You and I pragmatically value capitalism that is consistent 
  > to UNIVERSAL libertarianism as good for economic progress.  
  > But, there may be occasions when economic progress is not as 
  > important as something else; say donating to church perhaps.  
  > So, while a TOTALLY 'free market' capitalism allows for things 
  > like 'Murder Inc' UNIVERSALIZED libertarianism would not.  
  > Something may be 'judged' as being 'good/bad' PRAGMATICALLY 
  > for a given use, but it's the free will conscious 'choice' 
  > made by a 'person' to which MORAL 'judgement' of 'good/bad' 
  > is exclusive.  'Morality' is only attributable to 'persons'  
  > 
  > Btw, as to your fascism* request: it may be 'good' for people 
  > who violate the libertarian physical aggression truce in the 
  > form of containment (prison?)   :)  
  > 
  > * 2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic 
  > or dictatorial control 
  > at http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary
  > <http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=fascism
  > > &va=fascism 
  > 
  > 
  > -Terry Liberty Parker 
  > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  >   _____  
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >






  ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 



  SPONSORED LINKS E government  Libertarian  E government strategy  
        Libertarian party  E government procurement  


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

    a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
      
    b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
      
    c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to