Anna: "I must say that there is no free will, period"  

Well, if you don't believe free will exists then discussion 
of what is the 'right/wrong' thing to do is mote, since no 
individual can thus  be held acountable for such 'morality'  

Of course I disagree with this view of impotent individual 
NON-personhood!  

Please actually read and contemplate what I wrote addressing 
how to accomadate much of the 'subjectivity' about 'morals' 
in What's at the Heart of What Libertarians are Selling? 
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/30419 


-Terry Liberty Parker 



--- In [email protected], "Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Terry, are you talking about free will?
> 
> Morals are human invention which serve to protect oneself from a 
possible harm from others.
> They cannot be objective as they serve the  subjective self 
preservation  agenda. When I kill an ant, I violate ant's rights, but 
preserve mine. 
> Morals are always selfish. 
> There is no free Will outside  an individual ability to Agree or  
to Negate a  choice offered by the circumstances. Of course, even 
then we may not be able to change anything, but at least we can make 
a  'moral' choice. 
> Since it is illogical to claim a limited free will, I must say that 
there is no free will, period.
> Nevertheless, in physical universe altruism seems to be  well 
established. When electrons wait in line to  absorb a photon and 
jump  a level, nobody is pushing, but sometimes a place is  offered 
to a more needy electron.  For some reason, jumping up  a level  and 
becoming "alive" is important in microworld of particles. 
> So, perhaps  NO HARM law should embrace all life, born and unborn. 
But I doubt that humans are advanced enough to understand it, or 
practice.
> This would then require that we show respect for  animals and 
plants and stop killing them. 
> Since I believe that violence is in a great measure caused by our  
carnivorous habits, I sure am for it.  But I am only one of the very 
few people who think like this.  
> Anna
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Terry L Parker 
>   To: [email protected] 
>   Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 7:13 PM
>   Subject: [Libertarian] Re: PERSONHOOD: Abortion & beyond
> 
> 
>   Anna, better than what; conscious volition?  
> 
>   If by saying the word 'person' we are identifying an entity 
>   with the property of rights/duties capability, how can you 
>   leave out conscious volition and still have moral accountability
> 
>   Do you not believe that it is required for free moral agency?  
> 
> 
>   -Terry Liberty Parker 
>   Please see what I wrote in 
>   'Your Freedom and the Rights of Others'
>   at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/22990 
> 
> 
> 
>   --- In [email protected], "Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   >
>   > Terry, a better defintion is that personality is an individual  
map 
>   of consciousness. 
>   > Anna
>   >   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   >   From: Terry L Parker 
>   >   To: [email protected] 
>   >   Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 1:17 PM
>   >   Subject: [Libertarian] PERSONHOOD: Abortion & beyond
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   It's intellectually and  spiritually lazy 
>   >   to default to a comfortable prejudice 
>   >   shared by one's associates!   
>   > 
>   >   The term 'personhood' refers to the 'property' 
>   >   of being able to have rights & duties (obligations)
>   >   Human Beings are human lifeforms with 'personhood' 
>   >   for example.     
>   > 
>   >   Historically, we've been too quick to discount 
>   >   personhood when doing so was immoral; 
>   >   for example, slavery (person discounted to 
>   >   another person's property)  Determination 
>   >   of 'personhood' impacts not only the 
>   >   contemporary human abortion issue but also 
>   >   the morality of other life form encounters to come.  
>   > 
>   >   The intellectual & spiritual 'homework' 
>   >   yet to be done by many, is to develop 
>   >   a working criteria for who (or what) 
>   >   gets to be considered a person AND why. 
>   >   If you want that criteria to be 
>   >   generally acknowledged it has to be 
>   >   as rational and objective as possible.
>   > 
>   >   Here are *my* 'tentative' COMBINED criteria for 
>   >   who or what gets to be regarded as a person:
>   > 
>   >   sentience- ability to consider essential 
>   >   information about one's environment 
>   >   (surroundings, situation and so on)
>   > 
>   >   agency- power to act in that environment
>   > 
>   >   conscious volition- free will to intervene between 
>   >   stimulus and response by making meaningful choices; 
>   >   without which one can not be 'responsible' for 
>   >   one's actions that interface with other persons
>   > 
>   >   Imo, 'personhood' is about individual sovereigns 
>   >   (whose 'domains' are their own bodies and 
>   >   justly held possessions) being free moral agents; 
>   >   which still leaves room for acts of compassion   :)
>   > 
>   >   Domains 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/30419 
>   > 
>   >   Morals http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/37899
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   There are three essential areas of moral concern about human 
>   abortion:
>   > 
>   >   1. Personhood- At what point do rights and obligations accrue 
>   >   to the developing individual?
>   > 
>   >   The spectrum of opinion is from the moment of conception
>   >   (spiritual, before physical zygote) thru physical gestation 
>   >   to birth and a few years beyond (human infanticide is 
actually 
>   >   NOT regarded as murder in some societies)
>   > 
>   >   2. Obligation- If the developing individual is deemed 
a 'person'
>   >   what, if any, duty to that person exists, to provide support?
>   > 
>   >   No person has an 'automatic' claim on the resources of 
another 
>   >   person to provide them with support. But, did voluntary 
action 
>   >   by the 'host' person create an obligation to the 'dependent' 
>   person?
>   > 
>   >   3. Fatal Eviction- If the 'host' person has a right to deny 
>   >   support to the 'dependent' person, does the 'host' person's 
>   >   right to 'evict' the 'dependent' person include doing so in 
>   >   such a way that is fatal to said dependent?
>   > 
>   >   People of sincere conscience can be found on all sides of 
these 
>   >   three concerns.  
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   'The unexamined life is not worth living' 
>   >   Socrates, in Plato, Dialogues, Apology
>   >   Greek philosopher in Athens (469 BC - 399 BC)
>   >   at http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/24198.html   
>   > 
>   >   Please also enter the word consciousness at 
http://www.Google.com 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   -Terry Liberty Parker
>   >   see: 'Your Freedom and the Rigths of Others'  
>   >   at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/22990
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   SPONSORED LINKS E government  Libertarian  E government 
strategy  
>   >         Libertarian party  E government procurement  
>   > 
>   > 
>   > ----------------------------------------------------------------
----
>   ----------
>   >   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
>   > 
>   >     a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
>   >       
>   >     b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>   >      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   >       
>   >     c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! 
Terms 
>   of Service. 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > ----------------------------------------------------------------
----
>   ----------
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>   >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
> 
> 
> 
>   SPONSORED LINKS E government  Libertarian  E government strategy  
>         Libertarian party  E government procurement  
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
>   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 
> 
>     a..  Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
>       
>     b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       
>     c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms 
of Service. 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
AIDS in India: A "lurking bomb." Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpTY2A/lzNLAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to