Let me revise my original to comply with the guidelines.

 

--------------

 

Anna,

 

So far, your positions have included the following:

 

1) Giving fetuses full "citizen" status;

2) Implementing and enforcing new/old laws against abortion;

3) Implementing and enforcing a whole host of new
anti-abortion-related laws against pregnant women engaging in any
less-than-perfectly-healthy behavior; 

4) Doing 24/7 surveillance on all pregnant women to enforce the
above;

5) Imprisonment or execution for all women who violate #2 and for
all pregnant women who violate #3 or who violate any civil right
of said fetus-citizen.

6) Implementing and enforcing new "meta law";

7) Implementing and enforcing new taxes to pay for it;

8) That the dead have full "citizen" status;

9) Implementing and enforcing new/old laws against free-market
capitalism;

10) Government-forced redistribution of wealth / charity;

11) Implementing and enforcing new taxes to pay for it;

12) That all these positions are Libertarian;

13) Disagreements with standard dictionary definitions of
"person".

 

Let me know if I am incorrect about any of these, and if so -
how.

 

-Mark

 

PS: Terry, let me know if this is also not in compliance.

 

 

________________________________________

From: mark robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 2:37 PM

To: '[email protected]'

Subject: RE: [Libertarian] Who iz(or not) 'libertarian'

 

Agreed.

 

 

________________________________________

 

Discussion of who iz, or iz not, a TRUE 'libertarian'  

is counter productive,imo.  :(  

 

Discussion of libertarianISM, pro/con, can be edifying  :)

 

Attack/support messages, NOT messengers, in THIS forum!  

 

-Terry Liberty Parker 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 

 

 

--- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> 

> Anna,

> 

>  

> 

> You have:

> 

> 1) Used "citizen" to describe a fetus;

> 

> 2) called abortion a crime / recommended its prohibition;

> 

> 3) advised 24/7 surveillance of all pregnant women;

> 

> 4) advised "meta-law";

> 

> 5) implied agreement with many new "child abuse" laws against

> pregnant women for ANY less-than-perfectly-healthy behavior;

> 

> 6) advised new taxes to pay for it;

> 

> 7) given full rights to the dead;

> 

> 8) done it all on a Libertarian forum;

> 

> 9) tried to claim Libertarian status for yourself. 

> 

>  

> 

> Keep going. You're doing fine. Don't let me interfere. 

> 

>  

> 

> -Mark

> 

>  

 

________________________________________



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to