'Freedom' to violate you and yours is at the heart of LIMITED 'libertarianism'
In an apparent attempt to usurp the continuing philosophic triumph of libertarianism, there is a push to re-define the word to accommodate political expediency. Now that the prevailing other 'isms' have essentially fallen, the banner of 'liberty' becomes a hijacking target. Aggressors eagerly want to use its 'appeal' as camouflage for 'exceptions' they want to the UNIVERSALITY of actual consistent libertarianism. CONSISTENCY to society's 'physical aggression truce' (aka NAP 'non aggression principle' ZAP 'zero aggression principle' and so on) is not just an essential LIBERTARIAN principle, it is the foundation for liberty and justice for ALL! --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > An underlying principle in human action > is an innate `physical aggression truce' > which is also the underlying principle > for UNIVERSAL libertarianism. > > PleaseSee: What's at the Heart of What Libertarians are Selling? > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/30419 > > > This truce gives each person's > `self-ownership' (exclusive right > to determine use and disposition) > an essential material protection. > That can also be phrased as: > Reciprocal Physical Comprehensive Autonomy for each person. > > AlsoSee FlashAnimationAt- > http://www.isil.org/resources/introduction.html > > > Universal liberty's underlying 'physical aggression truce' > principle (aka NAP/ZAP and so on) thus accommodates > a just and broad array of choices by `self owning' > free moral agents, except for the INITIATION, > or CREDIBLE threat of initiation, of PHYSICAL force > against the person or justly held possessions > of another > > see: Your Freedom & the Rights of Others > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/22990 > > > So, what would morally justify a person INITIATING, > or doing a credible threat to initiate, physical force > against the person or justly held possessions of another; > AND, why should this `truce' EXCEPTION be allowable > over the truce exceptions that may be wanted by someone else? > > Why would any truce violation be justified? > > > -Terry Liberty Parker > 'Real world' experiment in LIBERTARIAN community became famous > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/message/2569 > > > > --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Without consistency to a 'physical agression truce' the common > ground > > for 'liberty & justice for all' in the material world just > vanishes! > > > > While MOST people, MOST of the time, on MOST issues, consciously or > > not, will abide by this 'truce' many seek 'exceptions' for their > own > > causes. So, they will claim that such a 'commonality' doesn't > exist; > > and that those who say otherwise are being absurd. Of course, > > people, including these 'exceptors' would NOT be able to walk out > > their door each day if there was no effective physical aggression > > truce already working. But, that observation seems not to disuade > > these exceptors from attempting to con other people about the > > matter. > > > > The truth is, that it is CONSISTENCY to this 'physical aggression > > truce' (aka NAP 'non aggression principle, ZAP 'zero aggression > > principle' and so on) which protects the 'self-ownership' autonomy > of > > virtually all persons. Most people DO seem to inherently > understand > > and usually apply the needed reciprocity; even if they don't know > how > > to spell that word, let alone consciously define it. This, in > fact, > > is the underlying principle for UNIVERSAL libertarianism; > > aka 'liberty & justice for ALL' > > > > So, a question to would be 'exceptors' is: what makes you think you > > have the right to initiate, or do a credible threat to initiate, > > physical force against the person or justly held possessions of > > another? > > > > PleaseSee: What's at the Heart of What Libertarians are Selling? > > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/30419 > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Imagine, if most can be persuaded to adhere to the libertarian > > > principle of a physical aggression truce, while some (being 'more > > > equal than others') can make exceptions for their cause(s)... > > > > > > oops! That is NOT consistent to a universal libertarianism. > > > > > > see: Your Freedom and the Rights of Others > > > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/22990 > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > The ONE common point of aggreement that is essential for MUTUAL > > > > benefit by individuals interacting, is a 'truce' on aggressing > > > > physically upon each other; aka universal libertarianism. > > > > > > > > see this about the Dandelion for graphic illustration of a > > singular > > > > point from which much can diverge (extrapolate?) > > > > at http://www.smm.org/sln/tf/d/dandelion/dandelion.html > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > CONSISTENT LIBERTARIANISM: > > > > > Reciprocal Physical Comprehensive Autonomy of Each Person > > > > > > > > > > Thoughtful observation demonstrates > > > > > that the principle of a 'physical aggression truce' > > > > > between individuals as a means of all > > > > > MUTUALLY benefiting from interactions > > > > > is older, and more prevalent, than the human race; > > > > > it is inherent to social species! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary http://m-w.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Main Entry: con·sis·tent > > > > > Pronunciation: k&n-'sis-t&nt > > > > > Function: adjective > > > > > Etymology: Latin consistent-, consistens, present participle > of > > > > consistere > > > > > 1 archaic : possessing firmness or coherence > > > > > 2 a : marked by harmony, regularity, or steady continuity : > > free > > > > from > > > > > variation or contradiction <a consistent style in painting> > > > > > b : COMPATIBLE -- usually used with with > > > > > c : showing steady conformity to character, profession, > belief, > > > or > > > > custom <a > > > > > consistent patriot> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Main Entry: lib·er·tar·i·an > > > > > Pronunciation: "li-b&r-'ter-E-&n > > > > > Function: noun > > > > > 1 : an advocate of the doctrine of free will > > > > > 2 a : a person who upholds the principles of absolute and > > > > unrestricted > > > > > liberty especially of thought and action > > > > > b capitalized : a member of a political party advocating > > > libertarian > > > > > principles > > > > > - libertarian adjective > > > > > - lib·er·tar·i·an·ism /-E-&-"ni-z&m/ noun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Main Entry: 1re·cip·ro·cal > > > > > Pronunciation: ri-'si-pr&-k&l > > > > > Function: adjective > > > > > Etymology: Latin reciprocus returning the same way, > alternating > > > > > 1 : inversely related : OPPOSITE > > > > > 2 : shared, felt, or shown by both sides > > > > > 3 : serving to reciprocate : consisting of or functioning as > a > > > > return in > > > > > kind <the reciprocal devastation of nuclear war> > > > > > 4 a : mutually corresponding <agreed to extend reciprocal > > > > privileges to each > > > > > other's citizens> > > > > > b : marked by or based on reciprocity <reciprocal trade > > > agreements> > > > > > - re·cip·ro·cal·ly /-k(&-)lE/ adverb > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Main Entry: 1phys·i·cal > > > > > Pronunciation: 'fi-zi-k&l > > > > > Function: adjective > > > > > Etymology: Middle English phisicale medical, from Medieval > > Latin > > > > physicalis, > > > > > from Latin physica > > > > > 1 : having material existence : perceptible especially > through > > > the > > > > senses > > > > > and subject to the laws of nature <everything physical is > > > > measurable by > > > > > weight, motion, and resistance -- Thomas De Quincey> b : of > or > > > > relating to > > > > > material things > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Main Entry: com·pre·hen·sive > > > > > Pronunciation: -'hen(t)-siv > > > > > Function: adjective > > > > > 1 : covering completely or broadly : INCLUSIVE <comprehensive > > > > examinations> > > > > > <comprehensive insurance> > > > > > 2 : having or exhibiting wide mental grasp <comprehensive > > > knowledge> > > > > > - com·pre·hen·sive·ly adverb > > > > > - com·pre·hen·sive·ness noun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Main Entry: au·ton·o·my > > > > > Pronunciation: -mE > > > > > Function: noun > > > > > Inflected Form(s): plural -mies > > > > > 1 : the quality or state of being self-governing; > especially : > > > the > > > > right of > > > > > self-government > > > > > 2 : self-directing freedom and especially moral independence > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Main Entry: each > > > > > Pronunciation: 'Ech > > > > > Function: adjective > > > > > Etymology: Middle English ech, from Old English [AE]lc; akin > to > > > Old > > > > High > > > > > German iogilIh each; both from a prehistoric West Germanic > > > compound > > > > whose > > > > > first and second constituents respectively are represented by > > Old > > > > English A > > > > > always and by Old English gelIc alike > > > > > : being one of two or more distinct individuals having a > > similar > > > > relation > > > > > and often constituting an aggregate > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Main Entry: per·son > > > > > Pronunciation: 'p&r-s&n > > > > > Function: noun > > > > > Etymology: Middle English, from Old French persone, from > Latin > > > > persona > > > > > actor's mask, character in a play, person, probably from > > Etruscan > > > > phersu > > > > > mask, from Greek prosOpa, plural of prosOpon face, mask -- > more > > at > > > > > PROSOPOPOEIA > > > > > 1 : HUMAN, INDIVIDUAL -- sometimes used in combination > > especially > > > > by those > > > > > who prefer to avoid man in compounds applicable to both sexes > > > > <chairperson> > > > > > <spokesperson> > > > > > 2 : a character or part in or as if in a play : GUISE > > > > > 3 a : one of the three modes of being in the Trinitarian > > Godhead > > > as > > > > > understood by Christians b : the unitary personality of > Christ > > > that > > > > unites > > > > > the divine and human natures > > > > > 4 a archaic : bodily appearance b : the body of a human > being; > > > > also : the > > > > > body and clothing <unlawful search of the person> > > > > > 5 : the personality of a human being : SELF > > > > > 6 : one (as a human being, a partnership, or a corporation) > > that > > > is > > > > > recognized by law as the subject of rights and duties > > > > > 7 : reference of a segment of discourse to the speaker, to > one > > > > spoken to, or > > > > > to one spoken of as indicated by means of certain pronouns or > > in > > > > many > > > > > languages by verb inflection > > > > > - per·son·hood /-"hud/ noun > > > > > - in person : in one's bodily presence > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you comprehend, embrace, be consistent to, and promote > this? > > > > > > > > > > 'Reciprocal physical comprehensive autonomy for each person' > > > > > refers to a society in which each person is sovereign > > > > > (aka individual sovereignty) over a physical domain > > > > > that consists of their body and honestly acquired possessions; > > > > > and a 'truce' on physical aggression by one person against > > > another. > > > > > > > > > > That does not necessarily describe an atomistic society with > no > > > > > interactions between these 'sovereign domains' It just means > > that > > > > > any physical interaction must be CONSENSUAL rather than the > only > > > > > alternative option, COERCIVE. Libertarians advocate > > a 'consensual > > > > > society' over the 'coercive society' of authoritarians. > > > > > > > > > > Libertarianism's 'physical aggression truce' premise (aka > > > > > NAP 'non-aggression principle' & ZAP 'zero aggression > > principle') > > > > > thus accommodates a just and broad array of choices by > > > > > free moral agents EXCEPT for the INITIATION, or credible > threat > > > > > of initiation, of physical force against the person > > > > > or justly acquired possessions of another. > > > > > > > > > > also see 'Your Freedom and the Rights of Others' > > > > > at <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/22990> > > > > > > > > > > Libertarians are NOT 'know it alls' so it's now up to some of > > you > > > > > folks in the audience to tell me and others, how would > > consistency > > > > > to this principle improve that part of the world in which YOU > > are > > > > > the expert? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Terry Liberty Parker > > > > > Libertarian InterNet `meet up' a `Winner' > > > > > at <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/27519> > > > > > > > > > > 'Real World' famous LIBERTARIAN community experiment > > > > > at > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/message/2569> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/g0CDCD/tzNLAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
