Jim, READ what you wrote!  

If you're telling me that you arn't able to understand policy 
well enough for me to trust you, then I will impose moderation. 
It's done with just a few keystrokes by me.  That means that 
your posts would languish in a que until my half blind eyes 
can get to them.  *IF* you want to continue posting here sans 
imposed moderation, do not label and/or attack people, and 
orient your posts to ideas, positions, issues, actions and so on
in exploring LIBERTARIANISM pro/con.  
 
I prefer that I can trust you to moderater yourself.  


-Terry Liberty Parker 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 



--- In [email protected], Jim Syler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What? Who? I compliment a friend and I deserve moderation? Perhaps 
this 
> isn't a worthwhile forum after all.
> 
> Or is it the "reasonable, intelligent and articulate" labels you 
object 
> to?
> 
> On Mar 27, 2006, at 7:23 PM, Terry L Parker wrote:
> 
> > Jim, your attempt to twist the conversation from an examination
> > of 'views' into an excuse for labeling people will land you
> > on imposed moderation.
> >
> > Stop it now!
> >
> >
> > -Terry Liberty Parker
> > Owner/moderator,
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In [email protected], Jim Syler <Calion@> wrote:
> >>
> >> Scott is hardly what I would call a "radical libertarian."
> > Especially
> >> now that he's a Republican and seems to have softened his 
message a
> >> mite. Who's been saying this? Not people in the LPI, I hope. 
Scott
> > is
> >> reasonable, intelligent, and articulate. Kudos to him for all 
he's
> >> done. I sincerely hope he runs again.
> >>
> >> j
> >>
> >> On Mar 27, 2006, at 5:04 PM, john_teschky wrote:
> >>
> >>> The word I'm picking up from the voices that may or may not be 
in
> > my
> >>> head is that the Bludorn won the regular GOP vote in the 
primary.
> >>> Rumors have it that, especially in the Lake County/Buffalo Grove
> >>> precincts (where Mathias shares ethnicity with many voters, and
> > where
> >>> he was Village President years ago), *groups* of people were
> > walking
> >>> into the polling places towards the end of the day saying, "I
> > want the
> >>> ballot with Mathias" on it (as opposed to asking for a Dem or 
GOP
> >>> ballot).  Since Bludorn only lost by about 555 votes, it is very
> >>> conceivable that it was these last-minute voters, not even sure
> > of the
> >>> party to which Mathias belonged, who swung the election.
> >>>
> >>> This information helps put to bed the misguided notion that
> > Bludorn's
> >>> "radical" libertarian views sunk his campaign.  It appears as if
> > the
> >>> GOP regulars liked and supported his uncompromising libertarian
> >>> message, but Mathias's personal network, built up over decades 
of
> >>> professional politicking, swung the election.  In a few months,
> > after
> >>> the polling data has been interpreted, this rumor can be better
> >>> validated.
> >>>
> >>> All of this is too bad for Bludorn, and for the libertarian
> > movement
> >>> in Illinois.  However, from my arrogant point of view, it serves
> > the
> >>> GOP right.  If they want the taxpayers to pay for their 
selection
> >>> process (primaries), then they will suffer defeats such as this.
> >>>
> >>> Guns and Dope,
> >>> John
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --- In [email protected], "terry12622000" 
<cottondrop@>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Are these people real libertarians or would a better term be
> > Classic
> >>>> liberal?--- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero
> > Rittberg"
> >>>> <ericdondero@> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Wrong.  Absolutely wrong, as a matter of fact.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Respected long-time Libertarian activist from Palm Beach, Phil
> >>>>> Blumel says that there is absolutely one supporter of
> >>>> libertarianism.  I believe his name is Bob
> >>>>> Collins, or something like that?  Recently elected.  Attends 
LP
> >>>>> meetings, and is formerly affiliated with the Republican 
Liberty
> >>>>> Caucus.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> (I may be wrong on the name.  I'll check into it.)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Phil also says that besides him, there are a few others who 
are
> >>>> very
> >>>>> sympathetic to libertarian ideals, and they will be meeting 
with
> >>>>> these legislators a couple weeks from now at the capitol in
> >>>>> Tallahassee, to discuss various issues.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> FYI, there have been libertarian supportive state legislators 
in
> >>>> Florida for many years now.  Past libertarian supportive
> > legislators
> >>>> included: Dick Graham of Ormond Beach, Mark Foley of Palm 
Beach,
> > Tom
> >>>> Feeney of Orlando, and a couple more in the Orlando area (can't
> >>>> recall their names at the moment.)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Oh, and if memory serves some guy from Ft. Walton Beach too.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --- In [email protected], "hrearden_hr" <HRearden@>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> There are no libertarians in the FL legislature.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>                $
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --- In [email protected], "Edward J. Williamson"
> >>>>>> <ejohnwilliamson@> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> quote: "BTW, there are at least 20 hardcore libertarians
> >>>> serving
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>> state
> >>>>>>>> legislatures around the country right now as Republicans,
> > many
> >>>>>>>> affiliated directly with the Libertarian Party, in states
> >>>> such
> >>>>> as
> >>>>>>>> Michigan (!!), California, Florida, Washington, Oregon, 
Mass,
> >>>>> NH and
> >>>>>>>> Alaska."
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I am familiar with the names of California's state 
legislators
> >>>>> and I
> >>>>>>> have not found one that is a Libertarian or has Libertarian 
by
> >>>>> their
> >>>>>>> political designation. Not one is a Libertarian. How about
> > some
> >>>>>>> names? You can't be a Republican and a Libertarian, or a
> >>>>> Democrat and
> >>>>>>> a Libertarian no more than you can be a conservative or a
> >>>>> libertarian
> >>>>>>> or a liberal and a libertarian. You are either a Libertarian
> > or
> >>>>> you
> >>>>>>> are not. It is that simple! End of story!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --- In [email protected], "Paul" <ptireland@> 
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There are absolutely zero libertarians serving in state
> >>>>> legislatures
> >>>>>>>> or in any other position while in the Republican party.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [ModeratorNote: I slipped up by letting Eric's comment 
thru,
> >>>>>>>> so you get to rebut this once.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> WHO iz or iz not a libertarian is OFF-topic in this forum
> >>>>> while
> >>>>>>>> WHAT is or is not libertarian is always ON-topic here.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -TLP  ]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero Rittberg"
> >>>>>>>> <ericdondero@> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Sounds like you're sympathetic to the libertarian
> >>>> Republican
> >>>>>>>>> strategy.  You may wish to check out the libt. GOP 
movement
> >>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>> www.rlc.org or over at Yahoo Libertarian Republican group.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> BTW, there are at least 20 hardcore libertarians serving 
in
> >>>>> state
> >>>>>>>>> legislatures around the country right now as Republicans,
> >>>>> many
> >>>>>>>>> affiliated directly with the Libertarian Party, in states
> >>>>> such as
> >>>>>>>>> Michigan (!!), California, Florida, Washington, Oregon,
> >>>>> Mass, NH
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>> Alaska.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --- In [email protected], "john_teschky"
> >>>>> <rockroller@>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Scott is as Libertarian as you, Paul.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> He accomplished much running as a Republican.  He stuck
> >>>> to
> >>>>> his
> >>>>>>>>>> Libertarian positions, yet still managed to earn the
> >>>>>>> endorsement of
> >>>>>>>>>> the local Republican party.  If he continues his hard
> >>>>> work, he
> >>>>>>>>> could
> >>>>>>>>>> very well be, eventually, the Ron Paul of Illinois.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> His switch to the GOP also played a big part in shaking
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> Illinois
> >>>>>>>>>> LP out of it's dysfunction and begin it's move back
> >>>>> towards
> >>>>>>>>> effectiveness.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Scott accomplished much for libertarianism in this area
> >>>> by
> >>>>>>> running
> >>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>> a Republican.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --- In [email protected], "Paul" <ptireland@>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Assuming he actually WAS a libertarian (which is almost
> >>>>> never
> >>>>>>>>> the case
> >>>>>>>>>>> with people YOU describe as libertarians), he sold his
> >>>>> soul
> >>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>> hopes
> >>>>>>>>>>> of winning and he still lost.  What did he accomplish
> >>>> by
> >>>>>>> running
> >>>>>>>>> as a
> >>>>>>>>>>> Republican?  NOTHING.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero
> >>>>> Rittberg"
> >>>>>>>>>>> <ericdondero@> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In case you guys hadn't heard yet, Libertarian Party
> >>>>> member
> >>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> current Republican Scott Bludhorn lost his GOP
> >>>> primary
> >>>>> race
> >>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> incumbenet 54 to 46% in the Chicago suburbs.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Though, Scott did increase his vote substantially
> >>>> from
> >>>>> his
> >>>>>>> 9%
> >>>>>>>>> showing
> >>>>>>>>>>>> as an LPer in 2004.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Let's hope his runs again for the seat in the future.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> -- 
> >> "The ground of liberty is to be gained by inches, and we must be
> >> contented to secure what we can get from time to time and 
eternally
> >> press forward for what is yet to get. It takes time to persuade 
men
> > to
> >> do even what is for their own good."
> >> – Thomas Jefferson
> >>
> >>
> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> -- 
> A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in 
> human history with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila.
>






ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to