Dr. Ruwart, I think would be a good choice if the LP must run someone
for president. I think it is wasteful running someone for president
and sends the wrong idea about the importance of the office but it
seems most libertarians feel the LP must run someone for office, so i
they do run a Libertarian, not A classic Liberal, not a conservative
either of the old type or the neo type, and not a neoliberal. Mary
Ruwart from what I gather is a real libertarian not someone
pretending like they
are.
I change my nomanation, Jesse Walker probally doesn't vote anyway
so he probally will not run for
office.
I nominate Mary
Ruwart.
I think we have a first and a second, all those in favor of
running Mary Ruwart,( who will not water down the LP platform and
will honor her membership pledge) write aye.--- In
[email protected], marc guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Libertarian Party 2008 Presidential Poll
>
> Do you support the Libertarian Party nominating a Celebrity or high-
profile public officeholder for President in 2008?
>
> Yes
> If yes, who would be your first choice:
> 6. Economist Walter Williams
> Would you rather see the Libertarian Party nominate a minor
celebrity or public officeholder who has much stronger ties to the
Libertarian Party?
> Yes
> Would you prefer that the Libertarian Party nominate a non-
celebrity candidate or someone who has never held public office
before who is a trusted Party insider?
> Yes
> If so, which of the following individuals would you prefer the most?
> 7. Mary Ruwart - TX
> Would you consider voting for a Republican if the Libertarian Party
fails to nominate a top-level candidate for President in 2008?
> No.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
