Then you would want to overturn the Taft-Hartley act. I'm in favor of that, but that is Federal Law and states only have the option of enforcing Right to Work statutes or not. Therefore, Right to Work laws in states are favorable to liberty if not as favorable as doing away with T&H altogether.
hrearden_hr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I know what it means. I live in a right to work law state. What it means is that legally membership in a union can not be a condition of employment. I believe that there should not be a law against union membership as a condition of employment. I believe that employers have a right to enter into agreements ans contracts with employees that state conditions of employment. I believe that employers have a right to establish conditions of employment. That is why I believe that right to work laws are an infringement of both the freedom of employers and employees to agree to a certain condition of employment. I do not believe that the government should restrict the type of agreements employers and employees can agree to. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
