Poor example on your part. We have SOLE DOMINION over our own body and we are the sole owner of our body. We are shareholders in the borders and we do not own it solely. When someone smokes pot, they are not infringing on the person, property, or rights of another. When someone smuggles goods across U.S. borders without the permission of "We the people" it violates the property, and rights of all Americans.
--- In [email protected], Cory Nott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's like suggesting it's not an initiation of force to arrest someone for smoking a joint because they CHOSE to smoke the joint while knowing it was against the law. The fact is that some people choose to charge others a tariff because they believe in a border, just as some people choose to incarcerate pot smokers because they believe that is necessary to curtail drug usage. Just because those people make up the majority in a particular region does not mean they aren't initiating force against the minority. > > > Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I say, "Tariffs are not an initiation of force because you CHOOSE to import goods knowing the tariff will apply if you do it" > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
