Assuming you are being serious, where is your evidence of
"violation" and "aggression" from those who "promote unlimited
Libertarianism"? If you can't provide any, at least supply a
theoretical example of what you are talking about. Or maybe you
didn't write that yourself?
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
_____
'Freedom' to violate you and yours
is at the heart of UNLIMITED 'libertarianism'
In an apparent attempt to impose
the continuing philosophic idealogy
of extreem libertarianism, there is a push
to demonize the pragmatists who seek real change.
Now that the comfortable obscurity of Libertariansm
has essentially fallen, the banner of 'liberty' becomes
a hijacking target of the 'consistant libertarians.' Aggressors
who
eagerly want to maintain that only they know what truely is
'liberty'
with no 'exceptions' to what they want to see construed as THE
UNIVERSAL view of libertarianism.
Don't hate me Terry :)
_____
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
