The thing is you will be governed even in a highly competitive system without any basic rules. There will still be courts and enforcement or in a bad scene just enforcement. Now a poly centric constitutional system would have competition for courts and police but they would have the same basic rules.To change the rules could require every service to agree, one service like a member of NATO could veto a change in a basic rule.--- In [email protected], "Andr� Kenji de Sousa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2006/4/13, Thomas L. Knapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Now we have the Internet, which makes exchange of information on a > > large scale nearly instantaneous, and it is now possible for > > self-selected groups of individuals who may not be geographically > > co-located to seriously consider various forms of self-government > > which invite/request support for their goals rather than demanding > > allegiance to self-proclaimed monopolies. Not without kinks and > > exceptions, of coruse, but it's coming. > > I flavor the *total* absence of government. I think that no one should > be forbidden to participate in these communities. But that´s not my > ideal. > > -- > André > > http://www.andrekenji.com.br > Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/andken/ >
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
