It also ignores that if the US goverenment dissolves and the state governments dissolve, people still could be interested in forming volunterly funded governments and possibly volunter un paid government workers to protect both property rights and the rights of the weak and to be a hedge against the private security companies and private aribtration and mediation services. In turn theese for profit or even non profit private sectors could be a hedge against the public sector. Personally I think having both a public sector and private sector will be much better in protecting liberty and justice. I think having only one will tend to lead to an abuse of power. Now I don't think having both is an absolute necessity, having either an all private sector or an all public sector for defense, police and courts might work out just fine as long as neither intatiates force but I really think it is wise not to put all of the eggs in one basket. Having a one world government could be libertarian correct and a small number of libertarians and Objectivist are pushing for that so I've been told but I think it really would be unwise to have a one world government, very unwise, it could turn into a big mess that would be hard to get out of.--- In [email protected], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Which is pretty much the case. If there were no government to protect > > your private property ownership, you could only keep what you could > > defend, and there will always be someone bigger, stronger, and tougher > > than you who can take what's yours and in anarchy, you'd have no > > recourse when they did other than some sort of vigilante justice with > > a lynch mob or something. > > Of course that completely ignores the fact that you could hire security to protect you life and property and that without the government stealing your property and corrupt police not doing the jobs that they are paid to do, you could afford Brinks, Sonitrol, or whomever to be the police for you, and it would be much more efficient and customer responsive than what we have today. > > And in anarcho-capitalism there would be much more wealth to go around and much less incentive to engage in violence. > > BWS >
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
