One of the underlying principles of central government army building is to move troops to locations where they are least likely to know any of the locals. That way, if there is unrest in some region, the troops stationed nearby will be far less likely to hesitate when ordered to shoot those locals though they may be fellow countrymen. I'm not sure why you think this is a better option than private security provided people whom you know and who know you.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 11:00 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Immigration This ignores a reality that anarchism has not been able to disprove. There is no way to privately have a common defense...PERIOD. None. Not one. Any private army that can be built could be used against us or against other private armies. It would be no different than Somalia. There is also no getting around the fact that anarchy is lawlessness, and offers no justice, or peace. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
