and vague.
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
_____
Mark,
It CAN although I do not contend that it OUGHT to be.
--- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Eric,
>
>
>
> Are you contrasting "beliefs" of libertarians against
principles
> of libertarian philosophy? If not, then you seem to be saying
> that libertarianism has no core philosophy or principles. For
> example, are you saying the libertarian principle of small govt
> (the goal of vastly reducing the size of our current one) can
be
> altered?
>
>
>
> -Mark
>
_____
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
