Re: [Libertarian] Re: Purity

Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:39:11 -0700

That is just untrue.  There are many non-anarchist who argue for a libertarian society and we call them libertarians as well.

BWS

----- Original Message -----
From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, April 29, 2006 12:26 pm
Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Purity

> I'd admit it if it were true, but it's not.  But then anyone who
> doesn't argue for anarchy would be considered a statist by those
> who think anarchy can work.
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "Cory Nott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The problem Paul has is that he tends toward absolutism in his
> argument.> According to him, anyone who doesn't believe in the NAP
> is not a
> > libertarian; Paul believes in the NAP so he is libertarian;
> therefore Paul
> > would never argue in favor of something that isn't libertarian. So
> far he's
> > proven that he will engage in some spurious attacks just to prove
> that he is
> > right, because if he is wrong he in not, by his own definition, a
> > libertarian. Most of us are smart enough to realize that we don't
> have all
> > the answers, that we are libertarian but sometimes fall into the
> statist> trap and that's why we have debates and discussions - to
> learn more
> about
> > liberty. Paul is arguing from a statist position, but I don't think
> he will
> > ever admit to it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian



SPONSORED LINKS
Libertarian English language Political parties
Online dictionary American politics

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



Reply via email to