One is not forced to enter a plea in court. What would you do? Would
you enter a plea?

                      $








--- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To accept, and to be forced to accept, are two quite different
> things.
>

>
> ************
> {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
> "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
> case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
> There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
> unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
> its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
> unjust lawsuits.
> See www.fija.org 
> [Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
>
> ------------------
>
>
>
>
> What about the act of going to court? If one is being sued or has
> been
> charged with a crime and they are defended or represented by an
> attorney in court is that acceptance of the court ruling either
> way?
>
>                        $
>
>                    
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected], <boyd.w.smith@> wrote:
> >
> > From: Grier Ellis <grier@>
> > > Actually, If you look at it *this* way (I am starting to), if
> you
> > > voted AT ALL,
> > > you are personally responsible for everything that government
> does.
> > >
> > > The act of voting signifies that you accept the outcome of a
> vote,
> > > either way.
> > >
> > > grier
> >
> >
> > I disagree.  Whether or not you accept the results does not
> mean you
> are responsible for the actions of the one who actually does win.
> No
> matter who you voted for.  That person did the actions and they
> are
> responsible.
> >
> > BWS
> >
>






ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian



SPONSORED LINKS
Libertarian English language Political parties
Online dictionary American politics


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to