As for your fist paragraph:
Racism, prejudice and ageism are red herrings. Obviously
personhood is not dependant on those criteria. No one here is
debating that. We are discussing personhood and abortion in the
context of different stages in human reproduction, where very
simple classifications can be made.
As for your second paragraph:
I continue to fail to make any sense out of around 75% of your
posts, but this paragraph is a topper. Please try to improve your
writing skills. Your writing is so substandard that until you
improve it, I (and others I imagine) can not tell if the problem
lies with your writing or your logic. Of course your writing may
occasionally work for you by mimicking success: when no one CAN
respond.
-Mark
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
------------
Its so much more than a simple logical process Mark. Its a very
complex process. Who gets to be a person? Are only whites
persons,
or perhaps only whites are full persons? Are only naturaly born
citizens persons? One ethnic group only? A certain age?
Classifications are not made on absolute truths but rather biased
by
the culture issuing the classification.
Rights are biased, the apply to all and are not handed out on a
biased choice. Those are privledges, and I find nothing more
unlibertarina than the idea of trying to claim rights are
something
deligated out by a temporaly dependant definition.
--- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Uncool,
>
> "Human" vs "person" is nothing more than a simple process of
> classification. There's nothing inherently prejudicial about
it.
> All snails are mollusks but all mollusks are not snails. A
> snail-shell is "of-snail", but a "snail-person" is more than
just
> a shell. All humans are mammals, but all mammals are not human.
A
> human-fetus is "of-human", but a "human-person" is more than
just
> a fetus. These divisions are logical and impart no more
> discrimination than they deserve.
>
> -Mark
>
> PS: Thanks for writing clearer.
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
