Yes, we three would agree on that, as would definition #6.
-Mark
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry L Parker
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 9:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Badnarik on Immigration
As Jon Roland said in another subject thread, 'person' refers to
a
ROLE while 'human' refers to BIOLOGY
-TLP
--- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Paul,
>
> Regarding "person", Merriam Webster grants synonymy with
"human"
> in def # 1. But def # 6 says: "one (as a human being, a
> partnership, or a corporation) that is recognized by law as the
> subject of rights and duties."
>
> Since this discussion is about abortion (and immigration?) and
> what life-stage qualifies for full rights, I assume #6 is the
> appropriate one here.
>
> -Mark
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
