can' twant to hear your attempt at logic to explain this one. If I
say a brick is not a person, I'm not dehumanizing it because it has no
human life. The same is true if I say a fetus has no human life.
But since you want to talk about the fictional character of "god"...
I, and the LP, say that we have SOLE DOMINION over our body and its
contents, regardless of what those happen to be. Sole DOMINION. This
means for all intents and purposes, I actually AM god when it comes to
my body. I alone dictate what will or won't live within my body, and
in fact I also choose whether or not I want to kill my entire body if
I feel like it.
Why? Because I alone own my body and everything inside it. I alone
have rights over my body and nothing inside my body has any rights,
especially when it comes to using my body. No person on earth other
than me has any say in what I do or don't do with my body or its
contents. No person or group of people regardless of their number has
any legitimate authority to prevent me from doing anything I want with
to body or any of the organisms within my body or to punish me for
those decisions. My authority is absolute and is not to be questioned.
You questioning what a pregnant woman is like questioning god when
there is an earthquake. You have nothing to say about god having an
earthquake in his DOMINION, and you have nothing to say about a woman
having an abortion over her DOMINION...aka Her Body.
--- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> To claim you have not dehumanized something is to claim you are god
> almight him/her self. See how easy it is to make up rediculous
> statements, I can do it to Paul.
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
