He is NOT taking the position you're attributing to him.
Either engage your brain BEFORE submitting text here or moderation
will be imposed upon you.
I prefer that you can be trusted by me to moderate yourself.
-Terry Liberty Parker
Owner/moderator,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
--- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I stated Life was an inalienable right. You stated that just
because
> I call something inalienable it does not make it inalienable. So
> Mark, make up your confused mind.
>
> --- In [email protected], "mark robert" <colowe@> wrote:
> >
> > Uncool,
> >
> > NO. Why would I want to do something like that? However you
> > inferred such fantasy, I have no idea; but I have no choice but
> > to conclude that the main point of your post is to make me into a
> > strawman (again). Do you know what I am talking about? Do you
> > know the logical fallacy known as the "Strawman" tactic? Do you
> > know that it is viewed as a cowardly strategy? I too would like
> > to know how old you are.
> >
> > -Mark
> >
> >
> >
> > ************
> > {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
> > "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
> > case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
> > There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
> > unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
> > its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
> > unjust lawsuits.
> > See www.fija.org
> > [Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
> >
> > -------------------------
> >
> >
> > So you wish to officialy state your belief is that Life is not an
> >
> > inalienable right?
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "mark robert" <colowe@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Uncool,
> > >
> > > Having a conversation about rights, and what has them and what
> > > doesn't, in no way implies that said rights are alienable /
> > > transferable / "assigned" / derived from the govt / synonymous
> > > with privileges / or granted by legislation. Not only did I not
> > > say anything about rights being any of those things, I did not
> > > imply it in any way. Your post is long-jumping to its own
> > > obviously-false conclusion and claiming it's mine so you can
> > > knock it down easily. That your post would stoop so low to make
> > > me into a strawman is a mind-boggler monstrosity.
> > >
> > > -Mark
> > >
> >
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
