with you, including taxonomy. Science does not consider a strand of
dna to be a whole human. Nor does it consider a pre-human to be a human.
--- In [email protected], "Thomas L. Knapp"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Quoth Mark Roberts:
>
> > Oh yeah, I forgot; you prefer to classify a fetus a "human
> > being"
>
> It's not a matter of my preference. It's a matter of standard taxonomy
> and recognition of fact.
>
> > I don't think you have read Buck's analysis close enough. None of
> > his examples of criminal investigations into fetal homicide are
> > above normal protocol. Your 5-year-old analogy has little
> > similarity because no death occurred. In Buck's analysis, a dead
> > body (fetus/embryo/zygote/fertilized egg) is found
>
> You need to re-read Buck's "analysis." It doesn't start with a "dead
> body" being "found." It starts with a bunch of invasive measures to be
> taken _in case there might be a "dead body" to "find"_.
>
> Tom Knapp
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
SPONSORED LINKS
| Libertarian | English language | Political parties |
| Online dictionary | American politics |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
