Nevermind the fact that all science disproves this, Tom Knapp said it,
so it must be true.
--- In [email protected], "Thomas L. Knapp"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Terry,
>
> > In the references you quoted, I did not see the word zygote equated
> > to the term 'human being'
>
> Interesting tactic: Reject explicit cites because they aren't
> concise/readily available enough to suit you, and reject
> concise/readily available cites because they aren't explicit enough to
> suit you.
>
> > I don't see that extending the term 'human being' to include a zygote
> > is either justified or helpful to communication
>
> Neither do I. Fortunately, no such "extension" is needed, since the
> term "human being" already does, and always has, included a zygote.
>
> Tom Knapp
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
SPONSORED LINKS
| Libertarian | English language | Political parties |
| Online dictionary | American politics |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
