life (Keep in mind, no sentience == no human life). You claim this to
be a FACT.
Prove it.
Give me some proof, not just baseless assertions.
--- In [email protected], "Thomas L. Knapp"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Quoth Paul Ireland:
>
> -----
> Here's your chance to show me what "proof" means to you Tom. Since you
> think you can put down the solid logic I've used.
> ----
>
> So far, you've made occasional logical arguments, but on unproven
> premises. Unless the premise is true, it doesn't really matter how
> logical the arguments made upon it are.
>
> -----
> Feel free to prove that a fetus has rights over and above those of a
> brick.
> -----
>
> Why should I try to prove that? I've already stated quite clearly that
> I have no intention of arguing any such point.
>
> -----
> I reject the notion that a fetus has human life.
> -----
>
> Your acceptance or rejection of facts is irrelevant to whether or not
> those facts are facts. Since a fetus is "an unborn or unhatched
> vertebrate in the later stages of development showing the main
> recognizable features of the mature animal," a human fetus that hasn't
> died has human life _by definition_.
>
> Tom Knapp
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
SPONSORED LINKS
| Libertarian | English language | Political parties |
| Online dictionary | American politics |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
