Yes, but in another way, that's a tough question. One would
assume the demonstrators were against free speech, since that was
the point of the demonstrations. But the demonstrations
themselves were engagements in their rights to free speech. It's
the old "my rights vs yours". I guess we're back to TLP's
"consistent and universal" application, since anything less is
relatively meaningless.
-mark
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
-----------------
Would you say that the Muslims who took to the streets and
protested,
rioted, destroyed property, and made threats to express their
disapproval of the cartoons of Mohommed are against free speech?
$
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--------------------~-->
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email
design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yHUd1C/hOaOAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM
-----------------------------------------------------------------
---~->
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2HUd1C/lOaOAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
