Then we should not refer to them as anything. I can see it now, the evening new reports that "5 -------- were killed in Faluja while two - ---- were captured in a raid earlier." How should we identify them? I suppose you like 'freedom fighters?' Ehh, thats a little more politically correct. I understand that we must always be politically correct. Never call an enemy an enemy. Hell, never call them anything. This we must do to show how 'educated' and 'intelligent' and 'sensitive' and 'understanding' we all are right?
--- In [email protected], "kiddleddee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "wgilbert02" <buckygilbert@> > wrote: > > > > It is different from vic's post, but my larger point was that issues > > such as gitmo aren't any different whatsoever. You can criticize > this > > government to death here, as I do very often, but the moment anyone > > mentions a single positive word about the U.S. or a single negative > > word about muslims, islamo-fascists, or terrorists, everyone is up > in > > arms. > ______________________________________________________________________ > > The term "muslims" is inclusive of all individuals who are adherents > to the religion of Islam. The term "islamo-fascists" has no meaning > whatsoever. The term "terrorist" has meaning only in context - "One > man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter." > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/bmUd6C/fOaOAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
