John,
By calling me another pejorative ("thick"), you are only digging
your ad-hominem hole deeper. Meanwhile I continue to wait for you
to respectfully and effectively explain your earlier
inconsistencies.
-Mark
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
--------------------
oh well....looks like thick would be a better phrase then.
what was your question specifically?
On 6/20/06, mark robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> John,
>
> Don't portray me as "stubborn" for questioning your words! YOU
> wrote them, not me. You WILL be called on your unsupported
> inconsistencies here; that's what we do here; that's what this
> discussion forum is all about.
>
> In this regard, NO, your position is still not clear.
>
>
> -Mark
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yHUd1C/hOaOAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
