John,
So you do not think the weakening of environmental laws is
directly helping to endanger this country. But you DO think said
weakening is INDIRECTLY helping to endanger this county; by
giving an advantage to Bush's backers thereby giving him more
power. Is that a fair assessment of your position?
-Mark
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
------------------------------
(sigh) OK mark....yo udon't want to do your own homework, so
I'll walk you
through this once more....although I wonder why you are putting
so much
energy into this. Of course I am flattered that you are so
...focused...on
my remarks, but I hope you aren't getting strange on me here.
Here we go...
In a context of claiming our country is in danger you blamed the
> weakening of environmental (and other) laws.
Noooo....it is in the context of the recent neocon takeover of
the Supreme
Court and their agenda of undoing specific legally legislated
laws. Better
now?
then....
> Here's a specific question. How will the weakening of
> environmental laws help do what you say? Now please simplify.
Noooo...I used the case of the attack on specific environmental
law to
highlight the Supreme Court's new position of supporting the Bush
agenda.
The weakening of that law is being done to give an advantage to
backers of
Governor Bush.
As I said Mark, it is not one particular law that matters....it
is the new
blending of powers in our government and the consiquent breakdown
of the
checks and ballances.
Better now?
Here is a quote from my second post that you didn't wanna read
over
again....
> Our laws are about to go the way of the locomotive. Governor
Bush is
> about to spring Martial Law on us to keep his ass in the White
House and end
> any possible prosecution for his crimes. He already has the
authority to do
> so without consulting Congress, thus shutting down the
Government.
> He also has been given authority to deploy Federal troops
domestically
> without putting them under the command of state Governors to
'restore and
> maintain order'. He has the plan in place under the guise of an
imminent
> 'bird flu' outbreak. He has the databases of who the
'troublemakers' are and
> who they talk to...me included i am sure....and as we speak
Halliburten is
> building the prisons in the southwest to hold 'illegal Mexican
> immigrants'...aka political prisoners from the USA.
>
Is that better for you Mark? I mean, you really didn't give a
rats ass what
I was saying anywho....be honest. You just wanted to do your
little-man *'no
I insist you keep argueing with me cause I can out debate you!"*
high school
shit anyway. Be honest. But....you now have your reply. It was
about the
Supreme Court acting to support the Bush agenda instead of
interpreting the
Constitution, as it is charged to do.
Happier lil' buddy?
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yHUd1C/hOaOAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
