Actually social security and medicare aren't a legal promise 
according to the Supreme Court in the 1950s, they are government 
social programs that Congess can cut at will and give to who they 
want or not give such as a deported Communist or seniors with incomes 
over 30,000 a year or real estate worth more than 200,000 dollars. 
The Amish said it was against there faith to pay into an social 
security insurance program besides they  said they took care of their 
old folks, they provided for them, the courts ruled again that it was 
not insurance but a tax for a program, although the Medicare bill of 
1965 did exempt self employed Amish from paying social security and 
medicare tax, largely due to public out cry of the mistreatment of 
the Amish in Iowa by school authorites.              
       Of course politicans and bureuctats, even some teachers and 
media people did mislead people into assuming social security was and 
is a insurance program, that there is an actual trust fund so this 
has the potentional of  possible law suits including class action 
suits.                                                                
  
     The government except maybe the local or county should get out 
of the health care or health care providing business including 
medicare and they should largely get out of the healthcare and drug 
regulation business and get out of the intellectual property business 
of  drug patents.--- In [email protected], "John Stroebel" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> well, let's be reasonable.
> 
> Let's cut our defence spending. We're throwing the money away 
anyway...but
> second let's start by requiring EVERY government contract to go 
through a
> bid process. No reason not to, would you agree?
> And when we stop paying 100% medican care to Iraqis we might discuss
> medicare.
> 
> and when the law is changed, and when every American who did NOT 
collect the
> soocial security funding he or she put in, we can talk about SSI 
and SS.
> How's that?
> 
> Oh...no, Bush was appointed, not elected the first time. The second 
time is
> still being debated. Remember that one, it is still being debated?
> 
> 
> On 6/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >    From: John Stroebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<john.stroebel%
40gmail.com>
> > >
> > > ow about...Bush was never legally elected and it the absolute
> > > worse drunk of
> > > an appointed President since Grant?
> > >
> >
> > Sorry to disappoint you on this one, we actually did legally 
elect him
> > both times. Stupid of us to do so, but still a legal election.
> >
> >
> > > How about we are spending money like it was growing on trees and
> > > our great grandkids will still be paying it off all so 
Halliburten can
> > roll
> > > in dough?
> > >
> > This one yes, the first thing that needs to go is welfare and 
Medicaid,
> > SSI and all other such crap.
> >
> >
> > > I think we can all agree on those facts.
> >
> > 
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> *******************************************************************
> Are YOU Preparing For The November '06 Elections NOW???
> 
> *******************************************************************
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Save-The-USA/
> 
> It is time to do something about all this!
> 
> *******************************************************************
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>







------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to